Anti-money Laundering

Last verified on Monday 13th November 2023

Anti-money Laundering : Australia

, , and

Money laundering

1. What laws in your jurisdiction prohibit money laundering?

Australia

The Criminal Code Act 1995 (Criminal Code), which applies to federal and commonwealth offences, includes several offences for money laundering. Chapter 10, Part 10.2, Division 400 of the Code currently defines 19 money laundering offences. These can be classified into two types: offences linked to the proceeds of crime (funds generated by an illegal activity) and those linked to the instruments of crime (funds used to conduct an illegal activity).

The federal Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) and its related Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules 2007 (AML/CTF Rules) also include money laundering offences.

Australian state and territory criminal legislation also contains money laundering offence provisions, as below:

  • New South Wales: Crimes Act 1900, Part 4AC;
  • Victoria: Crimes Act 1958, Part I, Division 2A;
  • Queensland: Criminal Proceeds Confiscation Act 2002, Chapter 9;
  • South Australia: Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935, Part 5, Division 4;
  • Western Australia: Criminal Code Act 1913, Part VII, Chapter LIX;
  • Tasmania: Crime (Confiscation of Profits) Act 1993, Part 6A;
  • Australian Capital Territory: Crimes Act 1900, Part 6, Division 6.2A; and
  • Northern Territory: Criminal Code Act 1982 (NT): Part VII, Division 3A.

Answer contributed by , , and

2. What must the government prove to establish a criminal violation of the money laundering laws?

Australia

The federal Criminal Code defines money laundering offences in terms of “dealing” with “money or other property” reasonably believed to be the proceeds of crime. There are different tiers of money laundering offence depending on the value of the money or property in question. Under the code, “dealing” occurs when a person receives, possesses, conceals or disposes, imports, exports or engages in a banking transaction relating to money or other property.

The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) must firstly prove the existence of physical elements that create the offence, relevant to establishing guilt. Secondly, in respect of each physical element for which a fault element is required, one of the fault elements for the physical element must also be proven.

In 2021, the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Economic Disruption) Bill 2020 amended the Criminal Code and created a new category for the proceeds of general crime offence with a lower threshold. Under the new general proceeds of crime offence, the prosecution does not have to show that the money or property in question is derived from a particular offence or even a general type of offence. These amendments are intended to capture the controllers of money laundering networks who do not deal with the money or property directly.

Answer contributed by , , and

3. What are the predicate offences to money laundering? Do they include foreign crimes and tax offences?

Australia

While the Criminal Code does not specify offences that predicate money laundering offences, predicate offences in Australia usually involve drugs and narcotics trafficking, fraud, theft and identity theft, tax evasion, people smuggling, arms trafficking and corruption offences. Criminal breaches of state and territory laws as well as foreign laws can also be predicate offences.

Answer contributed by , , and

4. Is there extraterritorial jurisdiction for violations of your jurisdiction’s money laundering laws?

Australia

Yes. The money laundering offences defined by the Criminal Code apply extraterritorially where the conduct occurs “wholly or partly in Australia” or “wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or ship”.    

For conduct occurring wholly outside Australia, this applies where:

  • the money or property is, is likely to become, or is at risk of becoming proceeds of crime as a result of violations of Commonwealth, state or territory indictable offences;
  • the person is an Australian citizen, resident or corporation; and
  • the offence is an ancillary offence, and the primary offence relevant to the ancillary offence occurred, or was intended to occur, wholly or partly in Australia or wholly or partly on board an Australian aircraft or ship.

Answer contributed by , , and

5. Is there corporate criminal liability for money laundering offences, or is liability limited to individuals?

Australia

Yes. The Criminal Code applies equally to bodies corporate as well as individuals and includes 19 offences related to money laundering.

The Australian Parliament has introduced the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Foreign Bribery) Bill 2023. The Bill will aim to increase corporate accountability by measures including introducing absolute liability for corporations if an associate of the corporation engages in foreign bribery for the profit or gain of the corporation. The Bill in its previous versions included a Deferred Prosecution Agreement scheme, however, this has now been removed. The Bill is currently before the Senate. 

Answer contributed by , , and

6. Which government authorities are responsible for investigating violations of the money laundering laws?

Australia

Agencies tasked with investigating money laundering include the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC), the Australian Federal Police (AFP), the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). State and territory law enforcement agencies and police may also investigate violations of money laundering laws.

Answer contributed by , , and

7. Which government agencies are responsible for the prosecution of money laundering offences?

Australia

At the national level, the CDPP is the primary government agency that is responsible for the prosecution of money laundering offences. The CDPP’s remit includes prosecuting money laundering offences that are criminalised under the Criminal Code.

The CDPP is assisted by AUSTRAC, the AFP and the Department of Home Affairs in prosecuting money laundering offences. 

At the state and territory level, the respective state or territories public prosecutions office is responsible for prosecuting money laundering offences that breach state or territory laws.

Answer contributed by , , and

8. What is the statute of limitations for money laundering offences?

Australia

The Criminal Code does not provide a specific time limit for prosecutions of money laundering offences. However, there is a time limit for the CDPP to bring proceedings, one year after the commission of a money laundering offence, if the penalty for an individual is a maximum term of six months' imprisonment or for a body corporate is 150 penalty units or less.  

At the state and territory level, the prosecution of money laundering offences also has time limits. For example, in New South Wales (NSW), there are summary offences of dealing with property suspected of being the proceeds of crime that require proceedings to be commenced no later than six and 12 months, respectively, after the offence was alleged to have been committed.

Answer contributed by , , and

9. What are the penalties for a criminal violation of the money laundering laws?

Australia

The Criminal Code provides varying penalties for money laundering offences, with the penalty that is applicable for a criminal violation depending on the value of the money or property that has been dealt with and the offender’s degree of knowledge.

For individuals, the maximum penalty is life imprisonment, or a fine of 2,000 penalty units (A$626,0000). However, this is only for money or property worth A$10 million or more. At the lower range of value, for money or property worth less than A$1,0000, the maximum penalty is either 12 or six months’ imprisonment or 30 penalty units (A$6,6600), or both (the maximum penalty of imprisonment will depend on the offender’s knowledge).

For corporations, the maximum penalty is a fine of 10,000 penalty units (A$3,130,000). The Criminal Code does not provide a specific fine, therefore as stated by the Crimes Act 1914 section 4B, the fine would be an amount not exceeding an amount equal to five times the amount of the maximum penalty unit that would be imposed by the court on a natural person convicted of the same offence.

One penalty unit is currently A$313, since 1 July 2023 (Crimes Act 1914 section 4AA).

Answer contributed by , , and

10. Are there civil penalties for violations of the money laundering laws? What are they?

Australia

The AML/CTF Act contains the civil penalties for violations of money laundering laws. Under the AML/CTF Act, individuals can face penalties up to A$6,260,000 for breaches of a civil penalty provision, while corporations can face penalties up to A$31.3 million for breaches of these provisions.

Answer contributed by , , and

11. Is asset forfeiture possible under the money laundering laws? Is it part of the criminal prosecution? What property is subject to forfeiture?

Australia

Australia’s anti-money laundering regime includes legislation that seeks to recover assets that were obtained through money laundering. At the Commonwealth level, the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POC Act) enables law enforcement to pursue the recovery of assets linked to offences after a conviction. The POC Act contains the unexplained wealth provisions at Part 2-6, where targets of these orders must prove on the balance of probabilities that their wealth was not derived from an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, a foreign indictable offence or a state offence that has a federal aspect. This legislation has a broad definition of asset which includes any money, real property and personal property, tangible or intangible, located in Australia or elsewhere.

Further, each Australian state and territory also has asset recovery legislation for funds generated by offences at a state or territory level.

In 2018, the National Cooperative Scheme on Unexplained Wealth was created. This scheme aimed to enhance the ability of the Commonwealth, state and territory law enforcement agencies to trace, identify and seize assets that cannot be connected to a lawful source. The scheme currently applies to New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. As required by the Scheme’s legislation, on 12 October 2023, the Australian Attorney-General’s Department announced the appointment of Mr Andrew Cappie-Wood AO to independently review the Scheme’s effectiveness and whether it has facilitated greater cooperation.

Answer contributed by , , and

12. Is civil or non-conviction-based asset forfeiture permitted under the money laundering laws? What property is subject to forfeiture?

Australia

The POC Act enables law enforcement to pursue restraint and recovery of assets suspected of criminal origins without the necessity of securing a criminal conviction. This form of recovery is labelled as a “forfeiture order”. 

Answer contributed by , , and

Anti-money laundering

13. Which laws or regulations in your jurisdiction impose anti-money laundering compliance requirements on financial institutions and other businesses?

Australia

The Australian anti-money laundering compliance regime is imposed by AML/CTF Act. This Act also enables the following AML rules and regulations:

  • Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules Instrument 2007 (No 1); and
  • Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (Prescribed Foreign Countries) Regulation 2016.

Answer contributed by , , and

14. What types of institutions are subject to the AML rules?

Australia

The AML rules apply to “reporting entities”. A reporting entity is a person or institution that provides a “designated service”. 

Section 6 of the AML/CTF Act contains a long list of designated services, divided into financial, bullion and gambling services. Financial services include, for example, accepting money on deposit and making loans.

In effect, the institutions subject to the AML rules are authorised deposit-taking instructions, banks, building societies, credit unions, superannuation funds, casinos and any other body that provides one or more of the services listed in section 6.

Answer contributed by , , and

15. Must payment services and money transmitters be licensed in your jurisdiction? Are payment services and money transmitters subject to the AML rules and compliance requirements?

Australia

Yes. Payment services and money transmitters are subject to the AML rules and compliance requirements. Under section 6 of the AML/CTF Act, “carrying on a business of giving effect to remittance arrangements” is a designated service. Exchanging foreign currencies as a currency exchange business is also a designated service. As providers of one or more of these services, payment services and money transmitters are reporting entities and must comply with the AML rules and requirements.

Payment services and money transmitters must be registered with AUSTRAC, the principal anti-money laundering Australian agency. An entity or person who conducts an unregistered money remittance business can be liable for a civil penalty section 51B of the AML/CTF Act.

Answer contributed by , , and

16. Are digital assets subject to the AML rules and compliance requirements?

Australia

Digital currency exchange providers are subject to the AML rules and compliance requirements. Part 6A of the AML/CTF Act imposes unique registration and reporting obligations providers of digital currency exchange services.

Under the AML/CTF Act, digital currency is a digital representation of value that:

  • functions as a medium of exchange, a store of economic value, or a unit of account;
  • is not government-issued;
  • is interchangeable with money; and
  • is generally available to members of the public.

All reporting entities are obliged to report to AUSTRAC if they observe any suspicious transactions involving digital currencies.

Answer contributed by , , and

17. What are the specific AML compliance requirements for covered institutions?

Australia

AML compliance under Australian law falls under three categories: an AML/CTF programme, ongoing reporting and record-keeping.

Reporting entities are required to implement an AML/CTF program identifying and mitigating the money laundering and terrorism financing risks faced by the business. Although the content will vary depending on the nature of the business and its designated service, each AML/CTF programme must include the following:

  • a comprehensive assessment of money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF) risks;
  • the appointment of an AML/CTF compliance officer;
  • independent review of the programme;
  • an employee due diligence programme;
  • AML/CTF training for employees;
  • an enhanced customer due diligence programme for when the ML/TF risk is high;
  • a transaction monitoring programme; and
  • know your customer procedures.

After preparing and implementing an AML/CTF program, reporting entities have ongoing compliance obligations. The key compliance obligations are to submit:

  • threshold transaction reports for transfers of A$10,0000 or more;
  • international funds transfer instruction reports for fund transfers into or out of Australia made electronically or under a designated remittance arrangement; and
  • suspicious matter reports when suspicious that a customer or transaction is related to criminal activity.

Entities must also submit compliance reports when requested by AUSTRAC, providing details of the entity’s compliance efforts to under the AML regime.

Reporting entities are also obliged to keep records about transactions, customer identification procedures and their AML/CTF programme. The specific record-keeping obligations depend on the reporting entity’s particular designated services.

Answer contributed by , , and

18. Are there different AML compliance requirements for different types of institutions?

Australia

The precise AML compliance requirements for a reporting entity will depend on the designated service that it provides. The content of an AML/CTF programme may vary substantially between entities that provide different designated services. 

Money remittance and digital currency exchange institutions have unique additional compliance requirements. Both types of institution must register with AUSTRAC and renew their registration every three years. Both types of institution must also keep an original or certified copy of a national police certificate for all key personnel and details of the institution’s business structure.

Answer contributed by , , and

19. Which government authorities are responsible for the examination and enforcement of compliance with the AML rules?

Australia

The government authority responsible for the examination, administration and enforcement of Australian AML law is AUSTRAC. 

AUSTRAC is leading the “Tranche 2 reforms” of the Australian AML/CTF regime, these reforms are the ongoing focus of several government agencies and departments including the Attorney-General Department and Australian Taxation Office. 

Tranche 1 comprised of the AML/CTF Act, which was passed in December 2006; while “Tranche 2” comprises a set of regulations that will simplify and modernise the Australian AML/CTF system and bring it in line with the Financial Action Task Force’s recommendations and other countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. The regulations include extending the AML/CTF regime to non-financial professions, including real estate and law.

In March 2022, the Senate’s Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee published its report on the adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s existent AML law and regulation. The report recommended the acceleration of the implementation of the tranche two reforms.

Between 20 April 2023 and 16 June 2023, the Attorney General held a public consultation on the tranche 2 reforms. A second consultation was expected to commence in September 2023, which will likely include draft legislation; however, as the time of writing no further details had been provided.

AUSTRAC has already indicated that feedback from the initial round of reforms will be used to inform subsequent drafting of the reforms over the course of the 2023.

Answer contributed by , , and

20. Are there requirements to monitor and report suspicious activity? What are the factors that trigger the requirement to report suspicious activity? What is the process for reporting suspicious activity?

Australia

Reporting entities are obliged under Australian AML law to monitor and report suspicious activity. Activity is suspicious and must be reported when the RE suspects that a person using their services is not who they claim to be, or that information concerning the activity may be relevant to investigate or prosecute a criminal offence.

Suspicious activity must be reported to the AUSTRAC CEO within either 24 hours or three days of the RE forming the relevant suspicion, depending on the nature of the activity. The report must be in an approved form and contain specific information about the suspicious activity and a statement outlining the grounds on which the RE has formed the suspicion.

A suspicious matter report can be lodged online through the AUSTRAC portal.

Answer contributed by , , and

21. Are there confidentiality requirements associated with the reporting of suspicious activity? What are the requirements? Who do the confidentiality requirements apply to? Are there penalties for violations of the confidentiality requirements?

Australia

Yes. A reporting entity must not disclose that they have given or are required to give AUSTRAC a suspicious matter report. This confidentiality requirement applies to the financial institution reporting the suspicious entity. However, information can be disclosed in certain circumstances, such as for the purpose of seeking legal advice. Breaching this confidentiality requirement is a criminal offence, known as “tipping off”. The offence of “tipping off’ is punishable by imprisonment for up to two years or a fine of up to A$37,560.

It is an offence for government officials to disclose information that they have obtained through AUSTRAC, except as authorised under AML law. This includes reports of suspicious activity. This offence is also punishable by imprisonment for up to two years or a fine of up to A$37,560.

Answer contributed by , , and

22. Are there requirements for reporting large currency transactions? Who must file the reports, and what is the threshold?

Australia

Yes. Part 3 of the AML/CTF Act imposes reporting obligations on reporting entities. Section 43 of the Act requires that entities providing designated services (such as banks, credit unions and other relevant financial companies) to report threshold transactions. The threshold is the transfer of physical currency (cash) of A$10,000 or more (or the foreign currency equivalent) as part of providing a designated service.

In addition, affiliates of remittance network providers, motor vehicle dealers who act as insurers or insurance intermediaries and solicitors must also report threshold and significant cash transactions.

Answer contributed by , , and

23. Are there reporting requirements for cross-border transactions? Who is subject to the requirements and what must be reported?

Australia

Yes. Part 4 of the AML/CTF Act requires financial institutions to report cross-border movements of monetary instruments.

Cross-border transactions are defined as international funds transfer instructions (IFTI). This is either:

  • an instruction that is accepted in Australia for money or property to be made available in another country; or
  • an instruction that is accepted in another country for money or property to be made available in Australia. financial institutions and apply to transfers of money.

Businesses, organisations or individuals who are not financial institutions such as remittance service providers and casinos, are also required to report transfers of money, as well as property.

Answer contributed by , , and

24. Is there a financial intelligence unit (FIU) or other government agency responsible for analysing the information reported under the AML rules?

Australia

Yes. AUSTRAC functions as Australia’s Financial Intelligence Unit and AML/CTF regulator. It is responsible for analysing information reported under Australia’s AML rules.

Answer contributed by , , and

25. What are the penalties for failing to comply with your jurisdiction’s AML rules, and are they civil or criminal?

Australia

Penalties for failure to comply with the Australian AML/CTF regime are outlined at Parts 12 and 15 of the AML/CTF Act. The Act imposes both criminal and civil penalties.

Criminal penalties apply to the most serious failures to comply with AML rules. The maximum penalties range from two to 10 years’ imprisonment and/or 120 to 10,000 penalty units (A$37,560 to $3,130,000). 

Division 2 of Part 15 outlines the civil penalties applicable to a broader range of AML rule breaches. The pecuniary penalty payable is determined by the Federal Court of Australia having regard to factors listed at sub-section 175(3) of the Act. The maximum penalty is 100,000 penalty units (A$31,300,000) for a body corporate and 20,000 penalty units (A$6,260,000) for a natural person.

In some cases, failure to comply with AML rules can be penalised by the issue of an infringement notice. An infringement notice carries a penalty of 60 penalty units ($18,780) for a body corporate and 12 penalty units (A$3,756) for natural persons.

In July 2023, the Federal Court of Australia ordered Crown Melbourne and Crown Perth, two Australian gambling companies, to pay a combined A$450 million penalty for serious breaches of the AML/CTF Act. The court found that Crown had failed to adequately monitor and report suspicious transactions and had facilitated money transactions involving high-risk customers. This is the third-largest fine in Australian corporate history.

Answer contributed by , , and

26. Are compliance personnel subject to the AML rules? Can an enforcement action be brought against an individual for violations?

Australia

The AML/CTF Act requires reporting entities to appoint compliance officers who are at management level. However, compliance officers are not specifically subject to the AML rules in the same manner as reporting entities. Compliance obligations are placed on the reporting entity, and not on its individual employees. A failure to comply with AML rules and provisions will be enforced by a fine against the company, and not the individual responsible. However, the offence provisions at Part 12 of the AML/CTF Act apply to any person, legal or natural. Therefore, if compliance officers make a false and misleading statement, civil or criminal enforcement action can be brought against them. 

Section 235 of the AML/CTF Act provides protection to employees of a reporting entity from civil or criminal liability for acts or omissions carried out in good faith in some circumstances.

Answer contributed by , , and

27. What is the statute of limitations for violations of the AML rules?

Australia

Civil penalty proceedings under the AML/CTF Act and its rules can be commenced no later than six years after the contravention. 

Answer contributed by , , and

28. Does your jurisdiction have a beneficial ownership registry or an entity or office that collects information on the beneficial ownership of legal entities?

Australia

No. Australia does not currently have a beneficial ownership registry. However, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet has put forward a proposal for such a register through the Open Government Forum.

In August 2022, the Australian Department of the Treasury announced that it will implement a public registry of beneficial legal owners of corporations as part of its commitment to greater transparency, with details to be announced in future.

Answer contributed by , , and

Unlock unlimited access to all Global Investigations Review content