Two high court judges have rebuked the SFO for failing to demand the written internal interview summaries from XYZ before offering the company a DPA in an opinion in which the judges also said the authority committed “a series of public law errors”.
More
-
2017: What’s coming up?
-
High Court rejects SFO application for costs in XYZ judicial review
-
XYZ judgment “final nail in the coffin” for internal investigation privilege claims
-
Corruption Watch calls for changes to “opaque and bureaucratic” court system in England and Wales
-
GIR Live: SFO to demand interview notes following XYZ-related judgment
Most Read
- UTC pays $13.9 million to settle bribery charges with SEC
- Brazilian healthcare corruption investigations show no sign of abating
- People news: SEC appoints two enforcement division associate directors
- Baker McKenzie seeks to be cut from malpractice suit tied to Brazilian bribery probe
- UK court clarifies scope of FRC’s access to privileged documents