Two high court judges have rebuked the SFO for failing to demand the written internal interview summaries from XYZ before offering the company a DPA in an opinion in which the judges also said the authority committed “a series of public law errors”.
/GIR-5-6-roi-1-326x248.png)
More
-
High Court rejects SFO application for costs in XYZ judicial review
-
XYZ judgment “final nail in the coffin” for internal investigation privilege claims
-
Corruption Watch calls for changes to “opaque and bureaucratic” court system in England and Wales
-
Singapore needs a bigger stick to take on corporate bribery
Investigator's Guide to Singapore
-
UK DPAs turn five
Most Read
- Proposed reforms to French blocking statute would still leave companies “stuck between two evils”
- Counsel Watch
- Russian bribery case shines light on failed counterintelligence operation
- FBI accountant who helped seal Manafort’s fate moves to FTI
- Former KBR agent fights to dismiss decade-old indictment