Two high court judges have rebuked the SFO for failing to demand the written internal interview summaries from XYZ before offering the company a DPA in an opinion in which the judges also said the authority committed “a series of public law errors”.
More
-
High Court rejects SFO application for costs in XYZ judicial review
-
GIR Live: SFO to demand interview notes following XYZ-related judgment
-
Corruption Watch calls for changes to “opaque and bureaucratic” court system in England and Wales
-
XYZ judgment “final nail in the coffin” for internal investigation privilege claims
-
2017: What’s coming up?
Most Read
- New association aims to professionalise the role of the corporate investigator
- Kokesh sinks SEC’s foreign bribery case against former Och-Ziff execs
- SFO secures conviction of ex-Barclays trader in Euribor trial
- Two executives found liable for Libyan fraud and bribery scheme
- Arrest warrant issued for CEO of Eurasian Resources Group