Two high court judges have rebuked the SFO for failing to demand the written internal interview summaries from XYZ before offering the company a DPA in an opinion in which the judges also said the authority committed “a series of public law errors”.
More
-
2017: What’s coming up?
-
High Court rejects SFO application for costs in XYZ judicial review
-
XYZ judgment “final nail in the coffin” for internal investigation privilege claims
-
Corruption Watch calls for changes to “opaque and bureaucratic” court system in England and Wales
-
GIR Live: SFO to demand interview notes following XYZ-related judgment
Most Read
- ThyssenKrupp retains firm for frustrated bribery investigation
- Companies would be “short-sighted and foolish” to cut FCPA compliance resources, says former DOJ unit chief
- Sir Brian Leveson: I could turn to Attorney General in DPA process
- FCPA Docket: Ex-Rolls-Royce agent calls jurisdiction ruling “troublesome”
- Irish law commission lays out comprehensive plans for corporate reform